Fiber optic interferometric sensor array with increased multiplexing density

ABSTRACT

The invention deals with an apparatus and a method for multiplexing and demultiplexing Fiber Optic Interferometric Sensors (FOISs), said apparatus comprising:
         means ( 1 ) forming an optical source for providing l×n distinct trio (ν qj , F j , τ j ) for the interferometric interrogation of l×n×m sensors, where for 1≦j≦p: ν qj  is the frequency of the optical source  4   qj  (1≦q≦n/p), F j  is a RF frequency carrier generated upon the lights of the n/p emitters emitting at the frequency ν qj  (1≦q≦n/p), and τ j  is a time window where the light of the n/p emitters  4   qj  (1≦q≦n/p) are on,   at least one sensing cable ( 100 ) comprising n groups of m fiber optic interferometric sensors each, and means for dedicating a unique given trio (ν qj , F j , τ j ) to the interrogation of a unique group of m fiber optic interferometric sensors;   at least one wavelength demultiplexing system ( 40 ) for separating the n frequencies ν qj  (1≦q≦n/p and 1≦j≦p) into n/p outputs ( 33   q  for 1≦q≦n/p) containing respectively the lights of wavelength bands B q  for 1≦q≦n/p, where B q  (1≦q≦n/p) contains the p wavelengths ν qj  for 1≦j≦p,   each output ( 33   q  for 1≦q≦n/p) having at least one photo-detector ( 7   q,  1≦q≦n/p) followed by one demodulator scheme ( 8   q,  1≦q≦n/p) receiving the interference signals of at least two groups of m fiber optic interferometric sensors each and born by the carrier frequencies Fj for a given group  5   qj  of sensors for 1≦j≦p;   a calibration system for determining the absolute time foot-prints of the interference signals of said at least two groups ( 5   qj  for 1≦j≦p) of m fiber optic interferometric on the q th  (1≦q≦n/p) photo-detector ( 7   q ).

The invention is related to a Fiber Optic Interferometric Sensors (FOIS) array.

The invention is also related to an apparatus for multiplexing/demultiplexing a Fiber Optic Interferometric Sensors (FOIS) array, and to a method for multiplexing/demultiplexing a FOIS array.

The invention can be dedicated to seismic sensing applications where the sensor arrays are made of several receiver points located at different places; each receiver point may contain several sensors.

Nevertheless, the invention is not limited to seismic sensing applications and can be dedicated to any sensing applications involving an array of FOISs spread into groups of sensors.

For seismic applications such as <<Deep Ocean Bottom Cable>> (DOBC), the arrays are made of several Receiver Points (RP), called nodes, distinct one from another and geographically spaced by a given distance. Each node comprises four sensors geographically located at the same point: the four sensors, one hydrophone and three geophones, form a Receiver Point or measurement node. The X-talk level required between the four sensors is very low.

Some external perturbations applied on an optical fiber length (pressure variations, temperature variations, vibrations, . . . ) cause the fiber length and index of refraction to change, leading to a change of the time propagation (or phase) of the light field propagating in the fiber. A FOIS is commonly made of two fibers: at its entrance, the light is divided into two optical fields:

-   -   the optical field propagating in a fiber length submitted to the         perturbation to measure (an acoustic signal for example): this         fiber length forms the sensing part of the FOIS,     -   the optical field propagating in a fiber length isolated from         the perturbation: this fiber forms the reference fiber of the         FOIS.         When the FOIS is submitted to an external perturbation, the         difference in time propagation, through the FOIS, of the two         optical fields will change. This change in time propagation (or         phase) difference is representative of the external perturbation         applied on the sensing part of the FOIS.

A FOIS interrogating system ensures the reading of the phase difference between two optical fields. It is made of an optical source providing the light, a telemetry fiber bringing the light to the FOIS, a return fiber bringing the light from the FOIS to a photo-detector on which the combination of the two optical fields leads to an interferometric signal bearing the information on the phase difference between the two optical fields, and an electronic demodulation system computing the phase difference from the photo-detector output interferometric signal.

In some applications, the sensors involved in an array can be as many as a few thousands. The decision to go for such arrays mainly depends on their cost and reliability.

In a FOIS array, the interrogating system is ideally shared between several FOIS so as to reduce the array cost: the optical source, the telemetry and return fibers, the photo-detector, and the electronic demodulation system can interrogate many FOISs. A FOIS array is thus made of one or more optical sources, of which light is guided to a group of FOISs. Each FOIS locally brings its information on the optical field that goes through it. The return fiber brings the modified optical fields to one or more photo-detectors. The interferometric signals from the different FOISs then need to be separated or demultiplexed. Demultiplexing of the interferometric signals is achieved by:

-   -   separating the electrical interferometric signals bearing the         response of one FOIS and generated on the photo receiver in the         time domain, through pulse gating schemes (Time Division         Multiplexing or TDM); or     -   separating the optical fields bearing the response of one FOIS         (or of a group of FOIS) before the photo-detector array in the         optical field wavelength domain, through optical wavelength         filters (Wavelength Division Multiplexing or WDM); or     -   separating the electrical interferometric signals bearing the         response of one FOIS (or of a group of FOIS) and generated on         the photo receiver in the frequency domain, through RF frequency         filters (Frequency Division Multiplexing or FDM).

As an example, the document <<Fiber interferometric sensor arrays with freedom from source phase induced noise>> in <<Optics Letters>>, vol. 11, July 1986, n^(o)7, pp. 473-475 (D1) presents a Time Division Multiplexing Technique. Detailed descriptions of the TDM and WDM techniques are, for example, disclosed in the patent application US 2007/0024857 (D1). The patent U.S. Pat. No. 5,959,294 (D3) discloses a method and apparatus for the interrogation of fiber optic interferometric sensors based on a FDM technique.

The combination of WDM and TDM techniques allows to increase the number of sensors in a network. The document “Remotely pumped and interrogated 96 channel fiber optic hydrophone array, in “Optical Fiber Sensor Conference 16”, pp. 760-763, November 2003” (D2) deals with a WDM-TDM combined technique. One can also mention the patent application US 2007/0024857 (D4), (improvement of the device disclosed in D2) which allows to get rid of the fabrication constraints to add fiber sections of accurate length in between each Fiber Optic Interferometric Sensor (FOIS) to interrogate (whether the sensors are located at the same node or not), and also allows to keep X-talk and reliability performances. Indeed, seismic applications require that the sensors are located at specific places in the array. Also ease of fabrication of the array, reliability and low X-talk between sensors are great benefits.

A WDM/FDM combined is proposed in the U.S. Pat. No. 7,154,082 (D5) patent.

Table 1a here below summarizes the multiplexing performances density of previous art solutions, in terms of:

-   -   1) Number (Nb) of multiplexed sensors on a single cable,     -   2) Number (Nb) of fiber buses per cable,     -   3) Number (Nb) of multiplexed sensors on a single Photo Detector         (PD).

TABLE 1a Nb of Nb of multiplexed Nb of fiber multiplexed sensors/cable buses/cable sensors/PD Multiplexing Techniques (1) (2) (3) TDM & WDM (D3) n_(λ) × n_(TDM/λ) n_(λ) n_(TDM/λ) Nb of wavelength (λ) used by the system = n_(λ) Nb of TDM channels per wavelength (λ) = n_(TDM/λ) WDM & FDM (D4) n_(λ) × n_(FDM/λ) n_(FDM/λ) n_(FDM/λ) Nb of wavelength (λ) used by the system = n_(λ) Nb of FDM channels per wavelength (λ) = n_(FDM/λ)

It would be an important improvement from the prior art to provide a multiplexing technique in order to:

-   -   reduce the number of fiber buses required to interrogate a given         number of sensors,     -   increase the number of sensors multiplexed onto a single         photo-detector (PD).

Indeed, the reduction of the number of fiber buses for a given number of sensors multiplexed onto the cable implies cost reduction and enhanced reliability of the apparatus because less fiber connectors are used. And the increase of the number of sensors multiplexed onto a single photo-detector implies cost and size reduction as less photo-detectors and less demodulation chains are required.

Accordingly, the invention aims at providing a new multiplexing technique which enables to achieve these improvements, thanks to an apparatus and a method for multiplexing and demultiplexing Fiber Optic Interferometric Sensors (FOISs).

More precisely, this aim is achieved thanks to an apparatus for multiplexing and demultiplexing Fiber Optic Interferometric Sensors (FOISs), said apparatus comprising:

-   -   means forming an optical source for providing l×n distinct trio         (ν_(qj), F_(j), τ_(j)) for the interferometric interrogation of         l×n×m sensors, where for 1≦j≦p:         -   ν_(qj) is the frequency of an optical source,         -   F_(j) is a RF frequency carrier generated upon the lights of             the n/p emitters emitting at the frequency ν_(qj) (1≦q≦n/p),             and         -   τ_(j) is a time window where the light of the n/p emitters             are on,     -   at least one sensing cable comprising n groups of m fiber optic         interferometric sensors each, and means for dedicating a unique         given trio (ν_(qj), F_(j), τ_(j), where 1≦q≦n/p and 1≦j≦p) to         the interrogation of a unique group of m fiber optic         interferometric sensors;     -   at least one wavelength demultiplexing system for separating the         n wavelengths ν_(qj) (1≦q≦n/p and 1≦j≦p) into n/p outputs         containing respectively the lights of wavelength bands B_(q) for         1≦q≦n/p, where B_(q) contains the p wavelengths ν_(qj) for         1≦j≦p,     -   each output having at least one photo-detector followed by one         demodulator scheme receiving the interference signals of at         least two groups of m fiber optic interferometric sensors each         and born by the carrier frequencies Fj for a given group of         sensors;     -   a calibration system for determining the absolute time         foot-prints of the interference signals of said at least two         groups of m fiber optic interferometric on the q^(th)         photo-detector.

The apparatus of the invention also comprises at least one of the following features:

-   -   The means forming an optical source comprise:         -   n optical emitters organized in p groups of n/p optical             emitters each, for providing the n lights of distinct             frequencies ν_(qj) (1≦j≦p; 1≦q≦n/p);         -   p wavelength multiplexers, each being associated with one             group of n/p optical emitters respectively;         -   p means following the wavelength multiplexers, for pulsing             the light of the n/p emitters of said group of n/p emitters             during the time window τj and generating the RF carrier             frequency Fj upon the lights of the n/p emitters, so that             each of these p means generates a couple of light pulses,             delayed one from the other by a pulse delay.     -   The means forming an optical source also comprise means for         successively switching on/off the p groups of n/p optical         emitters.     -   Each of the p means generating a couple of light pulses, delayed         one from the other by said pulse delay consists of two Acousto         Optical Modulators (AOMs) of different shift frequencies F_(ja)         and F_(jb) and combined with two optical couplers, each AOM         allowing to shift the frequency and to pulse the amplitude of         the light that goes through it, the light pulses pulse being         time delayed by a said pulse delay and carrying each n/p         frequencies ν_(qj)+F_(ja), ν_(qj)+F_(jb) for 1≦q≦n/p         respectively.     -   The means for dedicating a unique given trio (ν_(qj), F_(j),         τ_(j)) to the interrogation of a unique group of m fiber optic         interferometric sensors are means for dropping the wavelength         ν_(qj) to a respective group of sensors, and passing the other         remaining wavelengths.     -   The dropping means are distributed along a fiber and spaced one         from another by fiber optic sections of any length.     -   Each group of m fiber optic interferometric sensors, comprises m         fiber optic couplers of type 1 input towards 2 outputs disposed         in series along a main fiber, of which one output is coupled to         a respective fiber optic interferometric sensor.     -   The fiber optic couplers are spaced one from another by fiber         optic sections of identical length so that the round trip path         imbalance between two successive fiber optic couplers along the         main fiber is identical and equal to D″.     -   Two successive fiber optic couplers are arranged along the main         fiber in such a way that the path imbalance D″ is close to twice         said pulse delay;     -   Two successive fiber optic couplers are arranged along the main         fiber in such a way that the path imbalance D″ is close to said         pulse delay.     -   Each fiber optic interferometric sensor comprises a fiber optic         coupler of type 1 input towards two outputs, which input is         connected to one of the outputs of the respective fiber optic         coupler of the main fiber, the first output of the fiber optic         coupler being ended by a first mirror and its second output         being ended by a second mirror, the fiber optic portion between         the output of the fiber optic coupler and the second mirror also         comprising a compliant body.     -   For each group of m fiber optic interferometric sensors, the         short optical arm of each of the m sensors corresponds to the         optical path between the input of the fiber optic coupler and         the first mirror, and the long optical arm associated with each         of the m sensors corresponds to the optical path between the         input of the fiber optic coupler and the second mirror, the         round trip path imbalance between the short and long optical         arms being very close to said pulse delay.     -   The round trip path imbalance between the short and long optical         arms of at least one fiber optic interferometric sensor is         generated by the compliant body of the sensor itself.     -   Each of the 2*m mirrors of one group of sensors is a Fiber Bragg         Grating selectively reflecting the frequency ν_(qj).     -   Each of the 2*m mirrors of one group of fiber optic         interferometric sensors are not selective in wavelength, and are         gold mirrors for example.     -   The fiber optic interferometers forming the sensors are         Michelson interferometers or Fabry-Perot interferometers.     -   The apparatus is capable of interrogating I sub arrays, each         made up of n groups of m fiber optic interferometric sensors and         coupled by an optical coupling means to the means forming the         optical source.

This aim is also achieved thanks to a method for multiplexing and demultiplexing Fiber Optic Interferometric Sensors (FOISs), said method comprising the following steps:

-   -   generating l×n distinct trio (ν_(qj), F_(j), τ_(j)) for the         interferometric interrogation of at least one sensing cable         comprising n groups of m fiber optic interferometric sensors         each, where for 1≦j≦p:         -   ν_(qj) is the frequency of an optical source,         -   F_(j) is a RF frequency carrier generated upon the lights of             the n/p emitters emitting at the frequency ν_(qj) for             1≦q≦n/p,         -   and τ_(j) is a time window where the light of the n/p             emitters are on,     -   dedicating a unique given trio (ν_(qj), F_(j), τ_(j)) to the         interrogation of a unique group of m fiber optic interferometric         sensors;     -   receiving the response of at least two groups of m fiber optic         interferometric sensors on one photo-detector;     -   determining the absolute time foot-prints of the response of         said at least two groups of m fiber optic interferometric on the         q^(th) photo-detector.

The method according to the present invention can also comprise an additional step where, the n optical sources being organized in p groups of n/p optical emitters each, one switches on successively the p groups of n/p emitters to successively determine the absolute time foot prints of the response of the groups of m fiber optic interferometric on the demultiplexing system.

Other characteristics, objectives and advantages of the present invention will become apparent in the following detailed description illustrated by the appended figures, given as non restrictive examples and among which:

FIG. 1 shows a scheme of a system for the interrogation of one fiber optic interferometric sensor (FOIS);

FIG. 2 a is a representation of the light La in the telemetry fiber at the outlet of the first arm a of the interferometer that is required to interrogate the FOIS; this light is made up of one light pulse Pa, which has a specific frequency v0+Fa, the pulse being periodically generated at a repetition frequency F_(rep);

FIG. 2 b is a representation of the light Lb in the telemetry fiber at the outlet of a second arm b of the interferometer that is required to interrogate the FOIS; this light is made up of one light pulse Pb, which has a specific frequency v0+Fb, where Fb is different from Fa (and more specifically in that case Fb>Fa), the pulse being periodically generated at a repetition frequency F_(rep);

FIG. 2 c is a representation of the light L in the telemetry fiber at the outlet of the interferometer that is required to interrogate the FOIS; this light is made up of light pulses Pa and Pb;

FIG. 2 d is a representation of the light Lout formed of 2 couples of light pulses resulting from the couple (Pa, Pb) of light pulses represented at FIG. 2 c, at the outlet of the FOIS;

FIG. 3 shows a scheme of a system in accordance with the present invention, based on a combination of the TDM, WDM and FDM techniques, comprising p optical sources 40 j (1≦j≦p), each emitting a specific wavelength ν_(j), connected to a respective means M1, M2, . . . , Mj, . . . , Mp for generating the couple of pulses (P1 a, P1 b), (P2 a, P2 b), . . . , (Pja, Pjb), . . . , (Ppa, Ppb) respectively, a photo-detector 70 followed by a demodulator 80 for the interrogation of a plurality of p groups (or nodes) of m FOISs each;

FIG. 4 a is a representation of the light 210 in the telemetry fiber 13 at the outlet of a coupler 3 and composed of n couples of two light pulses 210 ₁, 210 ₂, . . . , 210 _(j), . . . , 210 _(p). The light 210 j required to interrogate a node 5 j (1≦j≦p) of m FOISs and is made up of a couple (P_(ja), P_(jb)) of light pulses, time-delayed one from another by the pulse delay PDj, the first pulse P_(ja) (1≦j≦p) bearing the light of frequency ν_(j)+F_(ja) and the second pulse P_(jb) (1≦j≦p) bearing the light of frequency ν_(j)+F_(jb), the couple (P_(ja), P_(jb)) being also periodically generated at a repetition frequency Frep;

FIG. 4 b is a representation of the group 340 of m*2 couples of light pulses resulting from the couple of light pulses (P_(ja), P_(jb)) represented in FIG. 4 a, at the output of the m FOIS-node referenced 5 j (1≦j≦p) illustrated on FIG. 5 a;

FIG. 4 c is a representation of the group 340 of m*2 couples of light pulses resulting from the couple of light pulses (P_(ja), P_(jb)) represented in FIG. 4 a, at the output of the m FOIS-node referenced 5 j (1≦j≦p) illustrated on FIG. 5 b;

FIG. 4 d is a representation of the m interference signals I51,m=(I_(1,11), I_(1,22), . . . , I_(1,kk), . . . , I_(1,mm)), I52,m=(I_(2,11), I_(2,22), . . . , I_(2,kk), . . . , I_(2,mm)), . . . , I5 p,m=(I_(p,11), I_(p,22), . . . , I_(p,kk), . . . , I_(p,mm)) on the photo detector 70 resulting respectively from the group 51, 52, . . . , 5 p of m sensors as represented on FIG. 5 a;

FIG. 4 e is a representation of the 2m interference signals I51,2 m=(I_(1,11), R_(1,12), I_(1,22), R_(1,23), . . . , I_(1,kk), R_(1,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(1,mm) R_(1,m(m+1))), I52,2 m=(I_(2,11), R_(2,12), I_(2,22), R_(2,23), . . . , I_(2,kk), R_(2,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(2,mm) R_(2,m(m+1))), . . . , I5 p,2 m=(I_(p,11), R_(p,12), I_(p,22), R_(p,23), . . . , I_(p,kk), R_(p,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(p,mm) R_(p,m(m+1))) on the photo detector 70 resulting respectively from the group 51, 52, . . . , 5 p of m sensors, as represented on FIG. 5 b;

FIG. 4 f is a representation of the gating pulses G_(j,11), G_(j,22), . . . , G_(j,mm) recorded during a calibration step and respectively used to properly time demultiplex the interference signals I_(j,11), I_(j,22), . . . , I_(j,mm) from the group 5 j of sensors illustrated on FIG. 5 a;

FIG. 5 a shows a scheme of one possible way of construction for one m FOIS-node 5 j (1≦j≦p) of FIG. 3 ; the m FOISs of the node 5 j (1≦j≦p) being disposed in a ‘series’ arrangement from the input point of the node;

FIG. 5 b shows a scheme of another possible way of construction for one m FOIS-node 5 j (1≦j≦p) of FIG. 3; the m FOISs of the node 5 j (1≦j≦p) being also disposed in a ‘series’ arrangement from the input point of the node, but the distance between two successive FOIS being twice the light path imbalance between the long arm and the short arm of one FOIS;

FIG. 5 c shows a means 6 j which selectively extracts the wavelength λ_(j) towards the group 5 j of m FOIS.

FIG. 6 shows a scheme of a system in accordance with the present invention, based on a combination of the TDM, WDM and FDM techniques, comprising p groups S_(j) (1≦j≦p) of n/p optical sources 4 jq (1≦q≦n/p with p≦n and n/p a positive integer, each group being connected respectively to means M_(j) and also comprising n/p photo-detectors 7 q (1≦q≦n/p), for the interrogation of a plurality of n groups (or nodes) of m FOISs each;

FIG. 7 shows in more details the n groups of m FOISs each, which are interrogated by the interrogation system of the complete system-illustrated in FIG. 6;

FIG. 8 a is a representation of the light 10 j at the outlet of the mean Mj (1≦j≦p), sent in the telemetry fiber 13 by means of a coupler 11, and that is required to interrogate a number of m*n/p FOISs among the m*n FOISs; this light being made up of the two light pulses P_(ja), P_(jb) time delayed one from another by the delay PD_(j); the light pulses P_(ja) and P_(jb) are made up of n/p light frequencies, respectively (ν_(j1)+F_(ja), ν_(j2)+F_(ja), . . . , ν_(jn/p)+F_(ja)) and (ν_(j1)+F_(jb), ν_(j2)+F_(jb), . . . , ν_(jn/p)+F_(jb));

FIG. 8 b is a representation of the groups 221, 222, . . . , 22 j, . . . , 22 p of light pulses coupled on the telemetry fiber 13 through the coupler 11 shown in FIG. 6; the light 22 j (for 1≦j≦p) being made up of a couple of light pulses P_(ja), P_(jb) of frequencies (ν_(j1)+F_(ja), ν_(j2)+F_(ja), . . . , ν_(jn/p)+F_(ja)) and (ν_(j1)+F_(jb), ν_(j2)+F_(jb), . . . , ν_(jn/p)+F_(jb)) respectively, the pulses being time delayed by PDj;

FIG. 8 c is a representation of the group 34 j of m*2 couples of light pulses resulting from the couple of light pulses (P_(ja), P_(jb)) represented in FIG. 8 a, at the output of the m FOIS-node referenced 5 j (1≦j≦m) illustrated in FIG. 7 and described in more details in FIG. 9;

FIG. 8 d is a representation of the 2 m interference signals I5 q 1,2 m=(I_(q1,11), R_(q1,12), I_(q1,22), R_(q1,23), . . . , I_(q1,kk), R_(q1,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(q1,mm) R_(q1,m(m+1))), I5 q 2,2 m=(I_(q2,11), R_(q2,12), I_(q2,22), R_(q2,23), . . . , I_(q2,kk), R_(q2,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(q2,mm) R_(q2,m(m+1))), . . . , I5 qp, 2 m=(I_(qp,11), R_(qp,12), I_(qp,22), R_(qp,23), . . . , I_(qp,kk), R_(qp,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(qp,mm) R_(qp,m(m+1))) on the photo detector 7 q resulting respectively from the group 5 q 1, 5 q 2, . . . , 5 qj, . . . , 5 qp of m sensors;

FIG. 9 shows one of the n groups of m FOISs, and more precisely, the group 5 jq;

FIG. 10 shows a scheme of a system in accordance with the present invention, based on a combination of the TDM, WDM and FDM techniques, and capable of interrogating l sub-arrays of n nodes of m FOISs.

FIGS. 1 and 2 a to 2 d describe the principle for the interrogation of one interferometric sensor.

S0 is a coherent light source (preferentially a DFB fiber laser source) of wavelength λ0 (and frequency v0). The continuous light the source S0 enters the mean M0 that is capable of generating the light L at its output. One mode of realization of M0 consists in using two AOMs of different shift frequencies Fa and Fb and combined with two optical couplers. Each AOM allows to shift the frequency and to pulse the amplitude of the light that goes through it. The mean M0 is thus made up of two arms a and b comprising respectively the AOMs a and b. The AOM a (AOM b respectively) is driven by a carrier frequency fa (fb respectively), which is switched on and off, with a pulse sequence a (pulse sequence b respectively). The light La (Lb respectively) at the output of the AOMa (AOMb respectively) is made up of pulses Pa (Pb respectively) of width PW, repeated at a repetition rate Frep. The frequency of light La (Lb respectively) is shifted by Fa (Fb respectively) due to a known property of Acousto Optic Modulators.

The lights La and Lb are recombined by a fiber optic coupler, to form the light L on the telemetry fiber. The light L is made up of Pulse sequences Pa and Pb (see FIG. 2 c). Pulse sequence Pa is delayed by a Pulse Delay PDa/b as compared to Pulse sequence Pb. The Pulse Delay PDa/b is achieved by delaying the drivers of AOM b and AOM a.

The Light L goes through a fiber optic circulator C down to the Differential Interferometric Sensor (sensor). The sensor shown on FIG. 1 is a Michelson interferometer. It is made up of 2 arms, one short arm, Arm s, and one long arm, Arm l, ended respectively by two total reflectors R0 s and R0 l. The Path Imbalance (PI) of the Differential Interferometric Sensor (DIS) corresponds to a time propagation which is equal to Pulse Delay PDa/b.

The reflection of light L by reflectors R0 s and R0 l gives rise to the light LOut, back to the circulator C. It is driven to a Photo Detector through the fiber Fout. The light LOut gives rise to light interferences on the photo-detector PD, through the optical pulses Pa reflected by the reflector R0 l of the DIS and the pulse Pb reflected by the reflector R0 s of the DIS. The interferences are born by the heterodyne carrier frequency F=Fa−Fb.

FIG. 3 shows a scheme of a system in accordance with the present invention, based on a combination of TDM, WDM and FDM techniques, and capable of interrogating p groups (or nodes) of m FOISs each. The proposed scheme is based on the state of the art principle (described in FIGS. 1, and 2 a to 2 d) of interrogation of one FOIS by a pulsed light.

The system comprises means 1 forming an optical source capable of generating the light 210 made up of p couples of light pulses.

The means 1 comprise a series of emitters 401, 402, . . . , 40 j, . . . , 40 p emitting a light at a respective frequency v1, v2, . . . , vj, . . . , vp which differ one from another. Each emitter 40 j (1≦j≦p) is followed a respective means Mj as the one described in FIG. 1. One mode of realization of Mj consists in using two AOMs aj and bj of different shift frequencies Fja and Fjb and combined with two optical couplers. Each AOM allows to shift the frequency and to pulse the amplitude of the light that goes through it. The mean Mj is thus made up of two arms a and b comprising respectively the AOMs aj and bj. At the outlet of each means Mj the light is thus made up of two light pulses [P1 a (ν1), P1 b (ν1)], [P2 a (ν2), P2 b (ν2)], . . . , [Pja (νj), Pjb (νj)], . . . , [Ppa (νp), Ppb (νp)] respectively of frequencies [ν₁+F_(1a), ν₁+F_(1b)], [ν₂+F_(2a), ν₂+F_(2b)], . . . , [ν_(j)+F_(ja), ν_(j)+F_(jb)], . . . , [ν_(p)+F_(pa), ν_(p)+F_(pb)]. The two light pulses respectively [P1 a (ν1), P1 b (ν1)], [P2 a (ν2), P2 b (ν2)], . . . , [Pja (νj), Pjb (νj)], . . . , [Ppa (νp), Ppb (νp)] are time delayed respectively by a pulse delay PD1, PD2, . . . , PDj, . . . , PDp, and are repeated at a repetition frequency F_(rep).

The respective means M1, . . . , Mj, . . . , Mp merge onto a coupler 3 (coupler of type “p” towards “l”) which send the light pulses Pja (νj), Pjb (νj), for 1≦j≦p into the telemetry fiber 13.

Thus, the light 210 driven by the telemetry fiber 13, as shown in FIG. 4 a, consists of p*2 light pulses 2101, 2102, . . . , 210 j, . . . , 210 p resulting from the respective 2 light pulses coming from the outlets of means M1, . . . , Mj, . . . , Mp respectively.

Following the light path, the system also comprises a fiber optic circulator 4, p groups (nodes) 51, 52, . . . , 5 j, . . . , 5 p of m FOISs to interrogate, p optical wavelength selective means 61, 62, . . . , 6 j, . . . 6 p, each disposed at the entry of a respective node, a photo-detector 70 and a demodulator 80.

The light 210 carried by the telemetry fiber goes through the fiber optic circulator 4 to the groups 51, 52, . . . , 5 j, . . . , 5 p of sensors.

The entry of each group 51, 52, . . . , 5 j, . . . , 5 p of sensors has an optical wavelength selective means 61, 62, . . . , 6 j, . . . , 6 p around the frequency ν1, ν2, . . . , νj, . . . νp respectively. As shown in FIG. 5 c, means 61, 62, . . . , 6 j, . . . , 6 m selectively extracts, respectively the wavelength λ₁, λ₂, . . . , λ_(j), . . . , λ_(m) towards, respectively the group 51, 52, . . . , 5 m of FOIS.

For ease of understanding, the description which follows only describes what happens for the j^(th) couple of light pulses 210 j which goes down to the j^(th) group 5 j, and back to the group 5 j to the photo-detector 70 (and demodulator 80). The man skilled in the art will understand that a similar description could be done for the other groups 51, 52, . . . , 5(j−1), 5(j+1), . . . , 5 p of sensors.

The j^(th) group 5 j is shown in details in FIG. 5 a or in a preferred embodiment in FIG. 5 b.

It consists of a main fiber FO_(j) extending from the optical wavelength selective means 6 j, and comprising m fiber optic couplers Ej,1 Ej,2, . . . , Ej,k, . . . , Ej,m of type <<1 input towards 2 outputs>> disposed in series. For each fiber optic coupler Ej,k (k=1 to m), one output is connected to the next fiber optic coupler Ej,(k+1) on the fiber FOj whereas the second output feeds the FOIS 54 j,k.

Each of the m FOIS 54 j,1, 54 j,2, . . . , 54 j,k, 54 j,m comprises at its input an optical coupler Fj,1 Fj,2, . . . , Fj,k, . . . , Fj,m of type <<1 input towards 2 outputs>>, followed by two arms: one long arm and one short arm. The long arm forms the long optical path of one FOIS, and the short arm forms the short optical path of the FOIS.

Each of the m FOISs also comprises a compliant body respectively 540 _(j1), 540 _(j2), . . . , 540 _(jk), . . . , 540 _(jm), arranged on the respective long arms.

The ends of the long and short arms of each of the m FOISs respectively comprise a mirror 54 _(j,l1), 54 _(j,l2), . . . , 54 _(j,lm), 54 _(j,s1), 54 _(j,s2), . . . , 54 _(j,sm). The 2 m mirrors 54 _(j,l1), 54 _(j,l2), . . . , 54 _(j,lm), 54 _(j,s1), 54 _(j,s2), . . . , 54 _(j,sm) can either be selective or not in frequency (wavelength). If the 2 m mirrors 54 _(j,l1), 54 _(j,l2), . . . , 54 _(j,lm), 54 _(j,s1), 54 _(j,s2), . . . , 54 _(j,sm) are frequency (wavelength) selective, they preferentially are Fiber Bragg Gratings that selectively reflects, respectively, frequency νj.

The round trip imbalance between the long and short mirrors of each of the m FOISs is equal to D′ and corresponds to a time delay t(D′) close to the pulse delay PDj between the pulses Pja(νj) and Pjb(νj). The round trip path imbalance between two successive FOIS 54 j,(k−1) and 54 j,k (for 1≦k≦m) is equal to D″ and corresponds to a time delay t(D″).

In the mode of realization illustrated in FIG. 5 a, the time delay t(D″) is close to the pulse delay between the pulses Pja(νj) and Pjb(νj) and named PDj, whereas in the mode of realization illustrated in FIG. 5 b, the time delay t(D″) is close to twice the pulse delay PDj.

We will now clear the path taken by the pulses for both modes of realization.

The couple 210 j of light pulses Pja(νj), Pjb(νj) entering the group 5 j of m FOISs is driven by fiber optic FOj to a fiber optic coupler Ej1. One part of the power is directed to FOIS 54 j,1 and the other part feeds another fiber optic coupler Ej,2 that splits the light into one part driven to the second FOIS 54 j 2, the other part feeding a third fiber optic coupler Ej3 and so on.

At the input of the FOIS 54 j,k (1≦k≦m), the light is a power fraction of the couple of light pulses Pja(νj), Pjb(νj). It is sent to the fiber optic coupler Fj,k that divides it into two identical lights of equal power directed towards the short and long mirrors 54 j,lk and 54 j,sk. The lights reflected by the mirrors 54 j,lk and 54 j,sk are then recoupled by the couplers Fj,k and Ej,k onto the optical fiber FOj. The reflection of the light onto the short mirror 54 j,sk gives rise to the couple of pulses [Pja,sk(νj); Pjb,sk(νj)] whereas its reflection onto the long mirror 54 j,lk gives rise to the couple of light pulses [Pja,lk(νj); Pjb,lk(νj)]. The two couples [Pja,sk(νqj); Pjb,sk(νj)] and [Pja,lk(νj); Pjb,lk(νj)] being time delayed one from the other by t(D′), which is close to the pulse delay PDj.

Thus, at the output of the node 5 j, the group 340 j illustrated of m*2 couples of pulses [P_(ja,s1)(νi), P_(jb,s1)(νj)], [P_(ja,l1)(νj), P_(jb,l1)(νj)], . . . , [P_(ja,sk)(νj), P_(jb,sk)(νj)], [P_(ja,lk)(νj), P_(jb,lk)(νj)], . . . , [P_(ja,sm)(νj), P_(jb,sm)(νj)], [P_(ja,lm)(νj), P_(jb,lm)(νj)], represented by FIG. 4 b or FIG. 4 c, is formed: the 2 couples of pulses {[P_(ja,sk)(νj), P_(jb,sk)(νj)], [P_(ja,lk)(νj), P_(jb,lk)(νj)]}, and the 2 couples of pulses {[P_(ja,s(k−1))(νj), P_(jb,s(k−1))(νj)], [P_(ja,l(k−1))(νj), P_(jb,l(k−1))(νj)]}, 1≦k≦m, being time delayed one from another by the time t(D″), the 2 couples of pulses [P_(ja,sk)(νj), P_(jb,sk)(νj)] and [P_(ja,lk)(νj), P_(jb,lk)(νj)] being time delayed one from another by the time t(D′), and the two pulses P_(ja,sk)(νj) and P_(jb,sk)(νj) of couple [iP_(ja,sk)(νj), P_(jb,sk)(νj)] and P_(ja,lk)(νj) and P_(jb,lk)(νj) of couple [P_(ja,lk)(νj), P_(jb,lk)(νj)] being time delayed one from another by the pulse delay PDj. In the scheme of FIG. 4 b corresponding to the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5 a, the time delays t(D′), t(D″) and PDj are equal. In the scheme of FIG. 4 c corresponding to the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5 b, the time delay t(D″) is twice the time delays t(D′) and PDj.

The combination of the pulses P_(jb,sk)(ν_(j)) and P_(ja,lk)(ν_(j)) onto the photo diode 80, gives rise to an interference signal Ij,kk at the Carrier Frequency Fj=Fjb−Fja that carries the sensor 540 j,k response to an external excitation. As can be seen in FIG. 4 c, the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5 b offers a redundant interference signals for the sensors 540 _(j,1), 540 _(j,2), . . . , 540 _(j,m−1), respectively R_(j,12), R_(j,23) R_(j,m(m+1)).

For example, the redundant interference signal Rj,12 for the sensor 540 _(j,1) results from the interference between the pulses P_(jb,l1)(ν_(j)) and P_(ja,s2)(ν_(j)). One can show that the phase information Φ_(main) born by the interference signal Ij11, for the sensor 540 _(j,1) is linked to the common cumulated phase noise Φ_(ccpn) and the sensor phase signal Φ_(sps) by the relationship:

Φ_(main)=Φ_(ccpn)−Φ_(sps)   (1)

Where Φ_(sps) is the phase generated on the frequency carrier Fj by an external excitation localized on the sensor 540 j,1, and Φ_(ccpn) is the phase noise accumulated on the carrier frequency, phase noise that one aims at getting rid off.

One can also show that the phase information Φ_(redundant) born by the redundant interference signal Rj,12 for the sensor 540 _(j,1) is linked to the common cumulated phase noise Φ_(ccpn), to the sensor phase signal Φ_(sps) and to the cumulated phase modulation Φ_(s+1,s) that the carrier might be altered with through the path from Fj1 to Fj2, by the relationship:

Φ_(redundant)=Φ_(ccpn)+Φ_(sps)−Φ_(s+1,s)   (2)

Accordingly, by substracting the relationships (2) and (1), one can obtain the following relationship:

Φ_(redundant)−Φ_(main)=2*Φ_(sps)+Φ_(s+1,s)   (3)

Equation 3 shows that one doubled the sensitivity of the sensor 54 j,1 (2*Φ_(sps) instead of Φ_(sps)) and got rid of the unwanted noise term Φ_(ccpn). On the other hand, the unwanted term Φ_(s+1,s) that corresponds to the cumulated phase modulation that the carrier might be altered with through the path from Fj1 to Fj2, appeared, but can be far reduced by isolating the corresponding fiber.

More generally, each sensor 540 _(j,k) (k=1 to m) gives rise to 2 interference signals I_(j,kk) and R_(j,k(k+1)) which can be used as previously described.

Thus, the preferred embodiment of the arrangement of the m FOISs (illustrated in FIG. 5 b) offers the possibility to eliminate the common phase noise and to double the system sensitivity.

Independently of the mode of implementation of FIG. 5 a or 5 b, the j^(th) group 340 j of m*2 couples of light pulses is then driven to the photo-detector and to the demodulator by the means 6 j and the circulator 4. Thus, the group 5 j of m sensors represented by FIG. 5 a gives rise on the photo detector 70 to the group I5 j,m of m interference signals (I_(j,11), I_(j,22), . . . , I_(j,kk), . . . , I_(j,mm)) and the group 5 j of m sensors represented by FIG. 5 b gives rise on the photo detector 70 to the group I5 j,2 m of 2 .m interference signals (I_(j,11), R_(j,12), I_(j,22), R_(j,23), . . . , I_(j,kk), R_(j,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(j,mm) R_(j,m(m+1))). Then, the m interference signals I_(j,11), I_(j,22), . . . , I_(j,kk), . . . , I_(j,mm) or the 2 .m interference signals (I_(j,11), R_(j,12), I_(j,22), R_(j,23), . . . , I_(j,kk), R_(j,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(j,mm) R_(j,m(m+1))) corresponding to the m sensors 540 j,1, 540 j,2, . . . , 540 j,k, . . . , 540 j,m from the j^(th) group 5 j of sensors are time demultiplexed by pulse gating means.

Similarly, each group 51, 52, . . . , 5 p of m sensors represented on FIG. 5 a gives rise on the photo detector 70 to the group of m interference signals respectively I51,m=(I_(1,11), I_(1,22), . . . , I_(1,kk), . . . , I_(1,mm)), I52,m=(I_(2,11), I_(2,22), . . . , I_(2,kk), . . . , I_(2,mm)), . . . , I5 p,m=(I_(p,11), I_(p,22), . . . , I_(p,kk), . . . , I_(p,mm)) and represented on FIG. 4 d. Similarly, each group 51, 52, . . . , 5 p of m sensors represented on FIG. 5 b gives rise on the photo detector 70 to the group of 2 m interference signals respectively I51,2 m=(I_(1,11), R_(1,12), I_(1,22), R_(1,23), . . . , I_(1,kk), R_(1,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(1,mm) R_(1,m(m+1))), I52,2 m=(I_(2,11), R_(2,12), I_(2,22), R_(2,23), . . . , I_(2,kk), R_(2,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(2,mm) R_(2,m(m+1))), . . . , I5 p,2 m=(I_(p,11), R_(p,12), I_(p,22), R_(p,23), . . . , I_(p,kk), R_(p,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(p,mm) R_(p,m(m+1))) and represented on FIG. 4 e. The photo-detector and the demodulator thus receive p groups of m or 2 m interference signals each. The means 1 forming the optical source also comprise calibration means. More precisely, the calibration means allow, during the calibration step, the emitters 40 j for 1≦j≦p to be successively turned on and off: when the emitter 401 of frequency ν1 is on, the other emitters are turned off, then the emitter 401 is turned off and the emitter 402 is turned on, whereas the other emitters remain off, and so on. This calibration step enables to sequentially take and record the absolute time ‘footprints’ of each group I5 j,m (or I5 j,2 m) of interference signals resulting on photo-detector 70 from the group 5 j of m sensors when the optical sources 401, 402, . . . 40 j−1, 40 j+1, . . . , 40 p are turned off. Indeed, the p groups I51,m, . . . , I5 j,m, . . . I5 p,m (or I51,2 m, . . . , I5 j,2 m, . . . I5 p,2 m) of interference signals, are in general not time aligned on the photo detector 70 (if one doesn't take care of the optical path in between two consecutive groups of sensors), and in order to achieve proper time pulse gating (i.e. time demultiplexing) of the m^(th) interference signals Ij,11, Ij,22, . . . , Ij,kk, . . . , Ij,mm (or the 2 m interference signals (I_(j,11), R_(j,12), I_(j,22), R_(j,23), . . . , I_(j,kk), R_(j,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(j,mm) R_(j,m(m+1)))) for each group 5 j (j=1 to p) of sensors, the mentioned calibration step is required.

More precisely, when the emitter 40 j is on and all the others are off, the photo-detector 70 only receives the group I5 j,m (or I5 j,2 m) of interference signals illustrated in FIG. 4 d (respectively FIG. 4 e) allowing the calibration means to take and register the absolute time foot prints corresponding to the particular group of sensors 5 j.

Accordingly, during the interrogation phase (following the calibration step) that is to say when all the emitters are simultaneously on, pulse gating is achieved for each group 5 j of sensors thanks to the absolute time footprints gathered and registered during the calibration step, allowing for a proper time demultiplexing of the interference signals from the m sensors. FIG. 4 f shows the gating pulses G_(j,11), G_(j,22), . . . , G_(j,mm) recorded during the calibration step and respectively used to properly time demultiplex the interference signals I_(j,11), I_(j,22), . . . , I_(j,mm) from the group 5 j of sensors. It is shown that the lights respectively gated by G_(j,11), G_(j,22), . . . , G_(j,mm) also contain interference signals from the other groups of sensors and born by frequencies Fk, k≠j: the demodulation at the particular frequency Fj therefore allows to isolate the signals from the sensors of group 5 j exclusively (Frequency Demultiplexing).

This technique allows the optical path to be loosely adjustable between any two groups of sensors (nodes). And this technique makes it possible to increase the number of sensors which response can be read by one single photo detector 70 by one dimension: number of wavelengths n_(λ)×number of frequencies n_(FDM/λ) (when previous art solutions offered density multiplexing on one photo receiver equal to either the number of wavelengths or the number of frequencies, see table 1a).

FIG. 6 is a schematic of a system in accordance with the present invention, increasing the multiplexing density of the system described by FIGS. 3, 5 a and 5 b to a higher quantity of groups of sensors (nodes),

The means 1 comprise p groups S_(j) (1≦j≦p where p≦n) each made up of n/p optical sources 41 j, 42 j, . . . , 4 qj, . . . , 4(n/p)j with p≦n and n/p a positive integer, for 1≦j≦p), each optical source 4 qj emitting a light at a respective frequency vqj (for 1≦q≦n/p 1≦j≦p) and being different one from another.

The frequencies vqj (1≦q≦n/p, 1≦j≦p) can be written in the form ν₁₁, ν₂₁, . . . , ν_(q1), . . . , ν_((n/p)1), ν₁₂, ν₂₂, . . . , ν_(q2), . . . , ν(_(n/p)2), . . . , ν_(1j), ν_(2j), . . . , ν_(qj), . . . , ν_((n/p)j), . . . , ν_(1p), ν_(2p), . . . , ν_(qp), . . . , ν_((n/p)p) and chosen such that ν₁₁<ν₁₂< . . . <ν_(1j)< . . . <ν_(1p)<ν₂₁<ν₂₂< . . . <ν_(2j)< . . . <ν_(2p)< . . . <ν_(q1)<ν_(q2)< . . . <ν_(qj)< . . . <ν_(qp)< . . . <ν_((n/p)1)<ν_((n/p)2)< . . . <ν_((n/p)j)< . . . <ν_((n/p)p).

Each group Sj is followed by a mean 3 j (1≦j≦p). 3 j can be a fiber optic coupler of type “n/p towards 1”, but is preferentially a wavelength multiplexer.

At the outlet of each mean 3 j, the light is then driven to a respective means Mj (1≦j≦p) as the one described in FIG. 1, and as shown in FIG. 6. In one mode of realization, the means Mj consists of two Acousto Optical Modulators (AOMs) aj and bj of different shift frequencies Fja and Fjb and combined with two optical couplers. Each AOM allows to shift the frequency and to pulse the amplitude of the light that goes through it. The mean Mj is thus made up of two arms comprising respectively the AOMs aj and bj.

FIG. 8 a describes the light 22 j (1≦j≦p) at the outlet of each means Mj (for 1≦j≦p): it is made up of two light pulses Pja (ν_(1j), ν_(2j), . . . , ν_(qj), . . . ν_((n/p)j)) and Pjb (ν_(1j), ν_(2j), . . . , ν_(qj), . . . , ν_((n/p)j)) of frequencies respectively (ν_(1j)+F_(ja), ν_(2j)+F_(ja), . . . , ν_((n/p)j)+F_(ja)) and (ν_(1j)+F_(jb), ν_(2j)+F_(jb), . . . , ν_((n/p)j)+F_(jb)). The two light pulses Pja (ν_(1j), ν_(2j), . . . , ν_(qj), . . . , ν_((n/p)j)) and Pjb(ν_(1j), ν_(2j), . . . , ν_(qj), . . . , ν_((n/p)j)) are time delayed respectively by a pulse delay PDj, and are repeated at a repetition frequency F_(rep). The light 22 j can be seen as the sum of the n/p lights 211 j, 212 j, . . . , 21 qj, . . . , 21(n/p)j of wavelengths respectively ν_(1j), ν_(2j), . . . , ν_(qj), . . . , ν_((n/p)j).

The output lights 221, 222, . . . , 22 j, . . . , 22 p from the means M1, . . . , Mj, . . . , Mp merge onto the telemetry fiber 13 through a coupler 11 (coupler of type “p” towards “l”) and are driven to the groups of sensors 100 through the fiber optic circulator 4.

The group of sensors 100 is made up of n groups (nodes) 5 qj (for 1≦q≦n/p and 1≦j≦p) of m FOISs each, which can be written in the form 511, 512, . . . , 51 j, . . . ,51 p, 521, 522, . . . 52 j, . . . ,52 p, . . . , 5 q 1, 5 q 2, . . . ,5 qj, . . . 5 qp, . . . , 5(n/p)1, 5(n/p)2, . . . ,5(n/p)j, . . . 5(n/p)p. The entry of each group 5 qj (for 1≦q≦n/p and 1≦j≦p) has an optical wavelength selective means 6 qj which extracts the wavelength νqj from the light at its input and drives it to the group of sensors 5 qj, while passing the remaining part of the light.

As can be seen in FIG. 7, the n groups 511, 512, . . . , 51 j, . . . ,51 p, 521, 522, . . . 52 j, . . . ,52 p, . . . , 5 q 1, 5 q 2, . . . ,5 qj, . . . 5 qp, . . . , 5(n/p)1, 5(n/p)2, . . . ,5(n/p)j, . . . 5(n/p)p are successively arranged on the optical fiber 32, and separated by optical fiber sections that can be of any length and don't have to be equal in length one with another.

For ease of understanding, the description which follows only describes what happens with the light pulses 21 qj (1≦q≦n/p and 1≦j≦p) formed by the pulses Pja(vqj) and Pjb(vqj) of frequencies vqj+Fja and vqj+Fjb, which feed the group 5 qj of FOISs. The man skilled in the art will understand that a similar description could be done for any other groups of sensors.

One mode of realization of the group 5 qj is shown in details in FIG. 9. It corresponds to the group already illustrated in FIG. 5 b.

Accordingly, it consists of a main fiber FO_(qj) extending from the optical wavelength selective means 6 qj, and comprising m fiber optic coupler Eqj,1 Eqj,2, . . . , Eqj,k, . . . , Eqj,m of type <<1 input towards 2 outputs>> disposed in series. For each fiber optic coupler Eqj,k (k=1 to m), one output is connected to the next fiber optic coupler Eqj,(k+1) on the fiber FOqj whereas the second output feeds the FOIS 54 qj,k.

Each of the m FOIS 54 qj,1, 54 qj,2, . . . , 54 qj,k, . . . , 54 qj,m comprises at its input an optical coupler Fqj,1 Fqj,2, . . . , Fqj,k, . . . , Fqj,m of type <<1 input towards 2 outputs>>, followed by two arms: one long arm and one short arm. The long arm forms the long optical path of the FOIS, and the short arm forms the short optical path of the FOIS.

Each of the m FOISs also comprises a compliant body respectively 540 _(qj,1), 540 _(qj,2), . . . , 540 _(qj,k), . . . , 540 _(qj,m), arranged in the long arms.

The ends of the long and short arms of each of the m FOISs respectively comprise a mirror 54 _(qj,l1), 54 _(qj,l2), . . . , 54 _(qj,lk), . . . , 54 _(qj,lm), 54 _(qj,s1), 54 _(qj,s2), . . . , 54 _(qj,lk), . . . , 54 _(qj,sm). The 2 m mirrors 54 _(qj,l1), 54 _(qj,l2), . . . , 54 _(qj,lk), . . . , 54 _(qj,lm), 54 _(qj,s1), 54 _(qj,s2), . . . , 54 _(qj,lk), . . . , 54 _(qj,sm) can either be selective or not in frequency (wavelength). If they are frequency (wavelength) selective, they preferentially are Fiber Bragg Gratings that reflects frequency ν_(qj).

The round trip imbalance between the long and short mirrors of each of the m FOISs is equal to D′ and corresponds to a time delay t(D′) close to the pulse delay PDj between the pulses Pja(νqj) and Pjb(νqj). The round trip path imbalance between two successive FOIS 54 qj,(k−1) and 54 qj,k (for 1≦k≦m) of the group 54 qj is equal to D″ and corresponds to a time delay t(D″).

In the mode of realization illustrated in FIG. 9, the time delay t(D″) is close to twice the pulse delay PDj.

The couple 21 qj of light pulses Pja(νqj), Pjb(νqj) entering the group 5 qj of m FOISs is driven by the fiber optic FOqj to a fiber optic coupler Eqj,1. One part of the power is directed to FOIS 54 qj,1 and the other part feeds another fiber optic coupler Eqj,2 that splits the light into one part driven to the second FOIS 54 qj,2, the other part feeding a third fiber optic coupler Eqj,3 and so on.

At the input of the FOIS 54 qj,k (1≦k≦m), the light is a power fraction of the couple of light pulses Pja(νqj), Pjb(νqj). It is sent to the fiber optic coupler Fqj,k that divides it into two identical lights of equal power directed towards the short and long mirrors 54 qj,lk and 54 qj,sk. The lights reflected by the mirrors 54 qj,lk and 54 qj,sk are then recoupled by the couplers Fqj,k and Eqj,k into the optical fiber FOqj. The reflection of the light onto the short mirror 54 qj,sk gives rise to the couple of pulses [Pqja,sk(νqj); Pqjb,sk(νqj)] whereas its reflection onto the long mirror 54 qj,lk gives rise to the couple of light pulses [Pqja,lk(νqj); Pqjb,lk(νqj)]. The two couples [Pqja,sk(νqj); Pqjb,sk(νqj)] and [Pqja,lk(νqj); Pqjb,lk(νqj)] being time delayed one from the other by t(D′), which is close to the pulse delay PDj.

Thus, at the output of the node 5 qj, the group 34 qj of m*2 couples of pulses [P_(qja,s1)(νqj), P_(qjb,s1)(νqj)], [P_(qja,l1)(νqj), P_(qjb,l1)(νqj)], . . . , [P_(qja,sk)(νvqj), P_(qjb,sk)(νqj)], [P_(qja,lk)(νqj), P_(qjb,lk)(νqj)], . . . , [P_(qja,sm)(νqj), P_(qjb,sm)(νqj)], [P_(qja,lm)(νqj), P_(qjb,lm)(νqj)], represented by FIG. 8 c, is formed: the 2 couples of pulses {[P_(jqa,sk)(νqj), P_(jqb,sk)(νqj)], [P_(jqa,lk)(νqj), P_(jqb,lk)(νqj)]}, and the 2 couples of pulses {[P_(qja,s(k−1))(νqj), P_(qjb,s(k−1))(νqj)], [P_(qja,l(k−1))(νqj), P_(qjb,l(k−1))(νqj)]}, 1≦k≦m, being time delayed one from another by the time t(D″), the 2 couples of pulses [P_(qja,sk)(νqj), P_(qjb,sk)(νqj)] and [P_(qja,lk)(νqj), P_(qjb,lk)(νqj)] being time delayed one from another by the time t(D′), and the two pulses P_(qja,sk)(νqj) and P_(qjb,sk)(νqj) of couple [P_(qja,sk)(νqj), P_(qjb,sk)(νqj)] and P_(qja,lk)(νqj) and P_(qjb,lk)(νqj) of couple [P_(qja,lk)(νqj), P_(qjb,lk)(νqj)] being time delayed one from another by the pulse delay PDj. In the scheme of FIG. 8 c corresponding to the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 9, the time delay t(D″) is twice the time delays t(D′) and PDj. As explained for the arrangement of a node illustrated in FIG. 5 b, the arrangement illustrated in FIG. 8 c offers the possibility to eliminate the common phase noise and to double the system sensitivity.

In an alternative embodiment, one can have a node where the round trip path imbalance D″ between two successive FOIS is equal to PD_(j).

The group 34 qj of m*2 couples of pulses is thus recoupled back onto the main fiber 32 by means of 6 qj, and driven back to the circulator 4 which then directs it to a wavelength demultiplexing system 40 through the fiber 33. The light entering the system 40 is thus made up of n groups 34 qj (1≦q≦n/p and 1≦j≦p) of m*2 couples of pulses. The system 40 separates the light at its input onto n/p different outputs 33 ₁, 33 ₂, . . . , 33 _(q), . . . , 33 _(n/p) containing respectively the lights of wavelength bands B₁, B₂, . . . , B_(n/p), where B₁ contains the p wavelengths (ν₁₁, ν₁₂, . . . , ν_(1j), . . . , ν_(1p)), B₂ contains the p wavelengths (ν₂₁, ν₂₂, . . . , ν_(2j), . . . , ν_(2p)), . . . and B_(n/p) contains the p wavelengths (ν_((n/p)1), ν_((n/p)2), . . . , ν_((n/p)j), . . . , ν_((n/p)p)). Each fiber 33 _(q) (1≦q≦n/p) is followed by a photo-detector 7 q and a demodulator scheme 8 q.

Accordingly, each photo-detector 7 q (1≦q≦n/p) receives the p groups of lights (34 q 1, 34 q 2, . . . , 34 qj, . . . , 34 qp) resulting respectively from the groups 5 q 1, 5 q 2, . . . , 5 qj, . . . , 5 qp (where the sensors are arranged as described below) and giving rise to the interference signals shown by FIG. 8 d. Thus, the group 5 q 1 (1≦q≦n/p) of sensors gives rise on the photo detector 7 q to the group of interference signals Group I5 q 1,2 m={Iq1,11, Rq1,12, Iq1,22, Rq1,23, . . . Iq1,mm, Rq1,m(m+1)}; the group 5 q 2 (1≦q≦n/p) of sensors gives rise on the photo detector 7 q to the group of interference signals I5 q 2,2 m={Iq2,11, Rq2,12, Iq2,22, Rq2,23, . . . Iq2,mm, Rq2,m(m+1)}; . . . ; the group 5 qj (1≦q≦n/p) of sensors gives rise on the photo detector 7 q to the group of interference signals I5 qj, 2 m={Iqj,11, Rqj,12, Iqj,22, Rqj,23, . . . Iqj,mm, Rqj,m(m+1)}; . . . ; and the group 5 qp (1≦q≦n/p) of sensors gives rise on the photo detector 7 q to the group of interference signals I5 qp,2 m={Iqp,11, Rqp,12, Iqp,22, Rqp,23, . . . Iqp,mm, Rqp,m(m+1)}.

The means 1 forming the optical source also comprise calibration means. The calibration means allow the groups of emitters S_(j) for 1≦j≦p to be successively turned on: when the group S₁ of emitters is on, the other groups of emitters are off, then, the group of emitter S₁ is turned off and the group of emitters S₂ is turned on, whereas the other groups of emitters remain off, and so on. This calibration step enables to sequentially take and record the absolute time ‘footprints’ of each group I5 qj,2 m (1≦j≦p) of interference signals resulting on photodetector 7 q from the group 5 qj of m sensors when the groups of optical sources S1, S2, . . . , Sj−1, Sj+1, . . . , Sp are turned off. Indeed, the p groups I5 q 1,2 m, . . . , I5 qj, 2 m, . . . I5 qp,2 m of interference signals are in general not time aligned on the photo detector 7 q (if one doesn't take care of the optical path in between two consecutive groups of sensors), and in order to achieve proper time pulse gating on the photo detector 7 q (i.e. time demultiplexing) of the 2 m interference signals I_(qj,11), R_(qj,12), I_(qj,22), R_(qj,23), . . . , I_(qj,kk), R_(qj,k(k+1)), . . . , I_(qj,mm) R_(qj,m(m+1)))) for each group 5 qj (j=1 to p) of sensors, the mentioned calibration step is required.

More precisely, when the group Sj is on and all the others are off, the photo-detector 7 q only receives the group I5 qj, 2 m of interference signals illustrated in FIG. 8 d allowing the calibration means to take and register the absolute time foot prints corresponding to the particular group of sensors 5 qj.

Accordingly, during the interrogation phase (following the calibration step) that is to say when the groups of emitters S₁, S₂, . . . , S_(j), . . . , S_(p) are simultaneously on, pulse gating is achieved on photo-detector 7 q for each group 5 qj of sensors thanks to the absolute time footprints gathered and registered during the calibration step, allowing for a proper time demultiplexing of the interference signals from the m sensors. FIG. 8 d shows the gating pulses G_(qj,11), G_(qj,22), . . . , G_(qj,mm) recorded during the calibration step and respectively used to properly time demultiplex the interference signals I_(qj,11), I_(qj,22), . . . , I_(qj,mm) from the group 5 qj of sensors. It is shown that the lights respectively gated by G_(qj,11), G_(qj,22), . . . , G_(qj,mm) also contain interference signals from the other groups of sensors and born by frequencies Fk, k≠j: the demodulation at the particular frequency Fj therefore allows to isolate the signals from the sensors of group 5 qj exclusively (Frequency Demultiplexing). In an embodiment, the carrier frequencies Fj are different one from another.

This technique makes it possible to use less photo-detectors for a given number of groups of sensors to interrogate. This technique also allows for loosely adjustable distance between any two groups of sensors (nodes).

In an alternative embodiment, there is no calibration phase and the groups S₁, S₂, . . . , S_(j), . . . , S_(p) are successively turned on/off during the interrogation phase of the sensors. Thus, the group S₁ of emitters is turned on to interrogate the groups of sensors 511, 521, . . . 5 q 1, . . . , 5(n/p)1, then S₁ is turned off, and S₂ is turned on to interrogate the groups of sensors 512, 522, . . . 5 q 2, . . . , 5(n/p)2 and so on, according to a similar operation to that explained above.

The advantages by the invention can be summarized in the table 1b below.

TABLE 1b Nb of Nb of multiplexed multiplexed sensors/cable sensors/PD Multiplexing techniques (1) (3) TDM & WDM (D3) - prior art n_(λ) × n_(TDM/λ) n_(TDM/λ) Nb of wavelength (λ) used by the system = n_(λ) Nb of TDM channels per wavelength (λ) = n_(TDM/λ) WDM & FDM (D4) - prior art n_(λ) × n_(FDM/λ) n_(FDM/λ) Nb of wavelength (λ) used by the system = n_(λ) Nb of FDM channels per wavelength (λ) = n_(FDM/λ) TDM, WDM, FDM (invention) n_(λ) × n_(TDM/λ) n_(FDM) × n_(TDM/λ) Nb of wavelength (λ) used by the system = n_(λ) Nb of TDM channels per wavelength (λ) = n_(TDM/λ)Nb Nb of FDM channels = n_(FDM)

The interrogation system can be efficiently shared by several sub arrays, each made up n groups of m sensors each. FIG. 10 is a schematic of a system in accordance with the present invention, increasing the multiplexing density of the system described by FIG. 6 to l sub arrays. Indeed the fiber optic coupler 11 of type p towards l has l outputs bearing the light 221, 222, . . . , 22 j, 22 p described below.

Each sub-array 91, 92, . . . , 9 y, . . . , 9 l comprises n groups of m interferometric sensors, in which the m fiber optic sensors of a same node are separated by a specific distance, the n nodes of each of the l sub arrays can be spaced by any fiber length, and the distribution of the l sub arrays of the system can be any, as shown under the reference 100 in FIG. 6 for the sub-array 90.

Each sub-array 91, 92, . . . , 9 y, . . . , 9 l also comprises a demultiplexer similar to 40, n/p photo detectors similar to 70 followed by n/p demodulators, and arranged in a similar manner than the demultiplexer 40, the photo-detectors and the demodulators illustrated in FIG. 6 for the sub-array 90. The sub-arrays 91, 92, . . . , 9l are interrogated by one single and unique means 1 described in FIG. 6.

The advantages of the system shown by FIG. 10 are similar to those of the system described by FIG. 6, 7, 8 a to 8 d and 9. In addition, this system has the advantage to share the same means 1 forming optical source for the l sub-arrays, each sub-array having, however, its own demultiplexing means.

In an alternative embodiment, the l sub-arrays can be interrogated successively by sending the light coming from the means 1 forming optical source towards only one sub-array to interrogate.

The present invention is not limited to the modes of realization described above. More precisely, the fiber optic interferometric sensors can be Michelson interferometers or Fabry Perot interferometers or any interferometric means, selective in wavelength or not and allowing the proposed time multiplexing. 

1. Apparatus for multiplexing and demultiplexing Fiber Optic Interferometric Sensors (FOISs), said apparatus comprising: means (1) forming an optical source for providing l×n distinct trio {ν_(qj), F_(j), τ_(j)} for the interferometric interrogation of l×n×m sensors, wherein the optical source comprise n optical emitters (4 qj) organized in p groups (S_(j)) of n/p optical emitters each, for providing n lights of distinct light frequencies ν_(qj) for 1≦j≦p and 1≦q≦n/p, where F_(j) is a RF carrier frequency generated upon the lights of the n/p emitters emitting at the frequency ν_(qj), and τ_(j) is a time window where the light of the n/p emitters are on, at least one sensing cable (100) comprising n groups (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric sensors (54 _(qj,k)) each, and means (6 qj) for dedicating a unique given trio {ν_(qj), F_(j), τ_(j)} to the interrogation of a unique group (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric sensors; at least one wavelength demultiplexing system (40) for separating the n frequencies ν_(qj) into n/p outputs (33 _(q)) containing respectively the lights of wavelength bands B_(q) for 1≦q≦n/p, where B_(q) contains the p wavelengths ν_(qj) for 1≦j≦p, each output (33 _(q)) having at least one photo-detector (7 q) followed by one demodulator scheme (8 q) receiving interference signals of at least two groups (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric sensors each and born by the carrier frequencies Fj for a given group (5 qj) of sensors for 1≦j≦p; a calibration system for determining an absolute time foot-prints of the interference signals of said at least two groups (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric on the q^(th) photo-detector (7 q).
 2. Apparatus according to claim 1, in which the means forming an optical source comprise: p wavelength multiplexers (3 j), each being associated with one said group (S_(j)) of n/p optical emitters respectively; p means (Mj) following the p wavelength multiplexers (3 j) respectively, for pulsing the light of the n/p emitters (41 j, 42 j, . . . , 4(n/p)j) of said group S_(j) of n/p emitters during a time window τj and generating the RF carrier frequency Fj upon the lights of the n/p emitters (41 j, 42 j, . . . , 4(n/p)j) of said group S_(j), so that each of these p means (Mj) generates a couple of light pulses (P_(ja), P_(jb)), delayed one from the other by a pulse delay PD_(j) for 1≦j≦p.
 3. Apparatus according to claim 2, in which each of the p means (Mj) generating a couple of light pulses (P_(ja), P_(jb)) delayed one from the other by said pulse delay PD_(j) for 1≦j≦p consists of two Acousto Optical Modulators (AOMs) having different shift frequencies F_(ja) and F_(jb) and combined with two optical couplers, each Acousto Optical Modulator allowing to shift the frequency of the light that goes through it by said different shift frequencies F_(ja) and F_(jb) and to pulse the amplitude of the light that goes through it, to generate the light pulses (P_(ja), P_(jb)) being time delayed by said pulse delay PDj and carrying each n/p frequencies ν_(qj)+F_(ja), ν_(qj)+F_(jb) for 1≦q≦n/p respectively.
 4. Apparatus according to claim 2 or 3, in which each group (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric sensors comprises m first fiber optic couplers (E_(qj,k)) of type 1 input towards 2 first and second outputs disposed in series along a main fiber (FO_(qj)), of which the first output is coupled to a respective fiber optic interferometric sensor (54 _(qj,k)).
 5. Apparatus according to claim 4, in which the first fiber optic couplers (E_(qj,k)) are spaced one from another by fiber optic sections of identical length so that the round trip path imbalance between two successive first fiber optic couplers (E_(qj,k)) along the main fiber (FO_(jq)) is identical and equals a value D″.
 6. Apparatus according to claim 5, in which two first successive fiber optic couplers (E_(qj,k)) are arranged along the main fiber (FO_(qj)) in such a way that the round trip path imbalance D″ corresponds to a time delay t(D″) close to twice said pulse delay PDj.
 7. Apparatus according to claim 5, in which two first successive fiber optic couplers (E_(qj,k)) are arranged along the main fiber (FO_(qj)) in such a way that the round trip path imbalance D″ corresponds to a time delay t(D″) close to said pulse delay PDj.
 8. Apparatus according to any one of claims 4 to 7, in which each fiber optic interferometric sensor (54 _(qj,k)) comprises a second fiber optic coupler (F_(qj,k)) of type 1 input towards two first and second outputs, which input is connected to said first output of said first respective fiber optic coupler (E_(qj,k)) of the main fiber (FO_(qj)), the first output of the second fiber optic coupler (F_(qj,k)) being ended by a first mirror (54 _(qj,sk)) and the second output of the second fiber optic coupler (F_(qj,k)) being ended by a second mirror (54 _(qj,lk)), a fiber optic portion comprising a compliant body (540 _(qj,k)) being provided between the second output of the second fiber optic coupler (F_(qj,k)) and the second mirror (54 _(qj,lk)).
 9. Apparatus according to claim 8, in which for each group (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric sensors, a short optical arm of each of the m sensors corresponds to an optical path between the input of the second fiber optic coupler (F_(qj,k)) and the first mirror (54 _(qj,sk)), and a long optical arm associated with each of the m sensors corresponds to an optical path between the input of the second fiber optic coupler (F_(qj,k)) and the second mirror (54 _(qj,lk)), the round trip path imbalance between the short and long optical arms being equal to a value D′ and corresponds to a time delay t(D′) very close to the pulse delay PDj .
 10. Apparatus according to claim 9, in which the round trip path imbalance between the short and long optical arms of at least one fiber optic interferometric sensor (54 _(qj,k)) is generated by the compliant body (540 _(qj,k)) of the sensor itself.
 11. Apparatus according to any one of claims 8 to 10, in which each of the 2*m mirrors (54 _(qj,lk), 54 _(qj,sk)) of one group (5 qj) of fiber optic interferometric sensors dedicated to said unique given trio {ν_(qj), F_(j), τ_(j)} is a Fiber Bragg Grating selectively reflecting the light frequency ν_(qj).
 12. Apparatus according to claim 5 to 8, in which each of the 2*m mirrors (54 _(qj,lk), 54 _(qj,sk)) of one group (5 qj) of fiber optic interferometric sensors dedicated to said unique given trio {ν_(qj), F_(j), τ_(j)} are not selective in wavelength, and are gold mirrors for example.
 13. Apparatus according to any one of the preceding claims, in which the fiber optic interferometers forming the sensors are Michelson interferometers or Fabry-Perot interferometers.
 14. Apparatus according to any one of the preceding claims, which apparatus is capable of interrogating l sub arrays (9 r), each made up of said n groups (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric sensors (54 _(qj,k)) and coupled by an optical coupling means to the means (1) forming the optical source.
 15. Apparatus according to any one of the preceding claims, in which the means forming the optical source also comprise means for successively switching on/off said p groups (S_(j)) of n/p optical emitters.
 16. Apparatus according to any one of the preceding claims, in which the means (6 qj) for dedicating a unique given trio {ν_(qj), F_(j), τ_(j)} to the interrogation of a unique group (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric sensors (54 _(qj,k)) are means for dropping the light frequencies ν_(qj) to a respective group (5 qj) of sensors, and passing the other remaining light frequencies.
 17. Apparatus according to claim 16, in which the dropping means (6 qj) are distributed along a fiber and spaced one from another by fiber optic sections of any length.
 18. Method for multiplexing and demultiplexing Fiber Optic Interferometric Sensors (FOISs), said method comprising the following steps: generating l×n distinct trio {ν_(qj), F_(j), τ_(j)} for the interferometric interrogation of at least one sensing cable (100) comprising n groups (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric sensors (54 _(qj,k)) each, where for 1≦j≦p 1≦j≦p and 1≦q≦n/p: ν_(qj) is the frequency of an optical emitter (4 qj), F_(j) is a RF carrier frequency generated upon the lights of the n/p emitters emitting at the frequency ν_(qj) for 1≦q≦n/p, and τ_(j) is a time window where the light of the n/p emitters 4 qj are on, dedicating a unique given trio {ν_(qj), F_(j), τ_(j)} to the interrogation of a unique group (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric sensors (54 _(qj,k)); receiving a response of at least two groups (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric sensors (54 _(qj,k)) on one photo-detector (7 q); determining an absolute time foot-prints of the response of said at least two groups (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric sensors on the q^(th) photo-detector (7 q).
 19. Method according to claim 18, wherein the n optical emitters (4 qj) being organized in p groups (S_(j)) of n/p optical emitters each, the method comprises the following step: switching on successively the p groups (S_(j)) of n/p emitters to successively determine the absolute time foot-prints of the response of the groups (5 qj) of m fiber optic interferometric sensors on the demultiplexing system (200). 